Conservative SCOTUS majority overturns 40-year-old precedent in sovereign immunity case

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

With the makeup of the Supreme Court now leaning toward the right with a 5-4 conservative majority, it was predicted that the court would be more likely to issue rulings that are in line with the plain text of the U.S. Constitution.

That appears to be true with regard to the court’s recent 5-4 ruling in the case of Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt, which overturned a prior decision from 40 years ago that the current court held was inconsistent with the principle of states’ sovereign immunity.

Overturning precedent

The high court ruled on Monday that a state could not be sued by a private party in a different state unless it had first consented to be sued.

That decision reversed a 1979 Supreme Court ruling in the case of Nevada v. Hall, which declared that the Constitution offered no protection to individual states from private lawsuits originating in other states.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion in the 5-4 decision. The four liberal justices were led in their dissenting opinion by Justice Stephen Breyer.

The liberal justices felt that prior court precedent should have been left alone and criticized the conservatives for overturning of a past ruling by a slim 5-4 majority, revealing their deeper concern that other longstanding precedents could be overturned in the future by a similarly narrow margin.

Thomas’ majority opinion

In the majority opinion, Thomas wrote that the 1979 ruling “misreads the historical record and misapprehends the ‘implicit ordering of relationships within the federal system necessary to make the Constitution a workable governing charter and to give each provision within that document the full effect intended by the Framers.'”

With regard to the precedent set in that case, Thomas wrote that it was “irreconcilable with our constitutional structure and with the historical evidence” which showed that states did enjoy sovereign immunity from private lawsuits

Broader implications?

The case at the heart of the court’s decision involved a dispute between a microchip inventor named Gilbert Hyatt who lived in Nevada and sued the California Franchise Tax Board in 1992.

Hyatt’s suit demanded that the tax agency compensate him for damages resulting from an audit it conducted on suspicion that Hyatt had moved from California to Nevada in order to avoid paying the state’s personal income tax. Hyatt alleged that the board shared personal information about him with business associates and unconstitutionally invaded his privacy.

This was actually the third time this particular case found its way to the Supreme Court, but it will almost assuredly be the last.

Now that the court has overturned its own prior ruling and found that Hyatt had no right to sue California from a Nevada courtroom absent its consent, liberal activists are left worrying about which other precedents may be vulnerable under fresh review.

858 Responses

  1. Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your post seem to be running off the screen in Chrome. I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know. The style and design look great though! Hope you get the issue solved soon. Kudos

  2. Woah! I’m really enjoying the template/theme of this blog. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s difficult to get that “perfect balance” between user friendliness and appearance. I must say you’ve done a very good job with this. Additionally, the blog loads very quick for me on Internet explorer. Outstanding Blog!

  3. Your style is really unique compared to other people I’ve read stuff from. Thanks for posting when you’ve got the opportunity, Guess I will just book mark this web site.|

  4. Appreciating the persistence you put into your website and in depth information you present. It’s good to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same out of date rehashed material. Wonderful read! I’ve saved your site and I’m adding your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  5. When I originally left a comment I appear to have clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now every time a comment is added I get 4 emails with the exact same comment. Perhaps there is an easy method you can remove me from that service? Cheers!

  6. Can I just say what a relief to discover somebody that actually knows what they’re discussing on the internet. You actually understand how to bring an issue to light and make it important. More and more people must look at this and understand this side of your story. It’s surprising you aren’t more popular since you certainly have the gift.|

  7. Greetings! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a group of volunteers and starting a new project in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us beneficial information to work on. You have done a marvellous job!|

  8. Hi there! I simply would like to offer you a big thumbs up for the great information you’ve got here on this post. I am returning to your blog for more soon.

  9. I seriously love your website.. Pleasant colors & theme. Did you make this site yourself? Please reply back as I’m trying to create my very own site and want to know where you got this from or what the theme is named. Thanks!

  10. I seriously love your site.. Very nice colors & theme. Did you develop this web site yourself? Please reply back as I’m attempting to create my own blog and want to learn where you got this from or exactly what the theme is called. Many thanks!

  11. I do consider all of the concepts you have introduced in your post. They’re very convincing and can certainly work. Still, the posts are too brief for beginners. May you please extend them a bit from next time? Thanks for the post.

  12. We wanted to create a store where our customers can come to us and tell us their needs so we can help them find exactly what they are looking for.\n\nWe work tirelessly to find top quality products to bring you at a price you can afford

  13. Excellent weblog right here! Additionally your site rather a lot up very fast! What host are you the use of? Can I am getting your affiliate link on your host? I desire my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol|

  14. I do not even understand how I stopped up right here, however I thought this put up used to be great. I do not understand who you might be however definitely you are going to a well-known blogger if you happen to aren’t already. Cheers!|

  15. Its like you read my mind! You appear to know so much about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you could do with a few pics to drive the message home a bit, but other than that, this is great blog. An excellent read. I’ll definitely be back.|

  16. Oh my goodness! Awesome article dude! Many thanks, However I am going through troubles with your RSS. I don’t know why I can’t subscribe to it. Is there anybody else having similar RSS problems? Anybody who knows the solution will you kindly respond? Thanks!!

  17. Appreciating the commitment you put into your website and in depth information you provide. It’s awesome to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same old rehashed information. Great read! I’ve saved your site and I’m adding your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  18. I do trust all of the concepts you’ve offered to your post. They are very convincing and can definitely work. Still, the posts are very brief for starters. May just you please prolong them a little from subsequent time? Thanks for the post.|

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Popular