Pelosi angry about Trump’s ‘sneak peek’ at Mueller report, despite demanding same for Clinton in 1998

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

Prominent Democrats have exposed their self-serving hypocrisy once again in the aftermath of the release of the Mueller report that essentially cleared President Donald Trump of allegations that he conspired and coordinated with Russians during the 2016 election.

Led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Dems have expressed outrage at reports that President Trump was granted an opportunity to review the report prior to its public release — but a recently resurfaced video shows that Pelosi sang a different tune in 1998, when the situation was reversed and a Democrat president was the subject of a lengthy investigative report.

Pelosi assails Trump’s early look at Mueller report

Pelosi took to Twitter to register her disapproval that Attorney General William Barr granted the Trump White House a “sneak preview” of the Mueller report ahead of its release and demanded Mueller testify in front of Congress.

Pelosi tweeted, “AG Barr has confirmed the staggering partisan effort by the Trump Admin to spin public’s view of the #MuellerReport – complete with acknowledgment that the Trump team received a sneak preview. It’s more urgent than ever that Special Counsel Mueller testify before Congress.”

Argued for Clinton preview of Starr report

But back in 1998, as the Starr report targeting then-Democrat President Bill Clinton was about to be released, Pelosi took to the House floor to argue that the White House should have been afforded the opportunity to review that report against the president prior to the public, or even Congress, being allowed to read it.

During that speech, Pelosi referenced a House Ethics Committee investigation against then-Republican Speaker Newt Gingrich and noted that Gingrich had been allowed to respond to a report against himself prior to its release.

“Mr. Speaker, for seven of the eleven years that I have served in Congress, I have served on the Ethics Committee or the ethics task force. It is from that perspective that I have several questions to ask,” Pelosi said.

She went on: “If indeed what we are talking about here today is the process under which the Starr report will be released, why then have the airwaves been filled with details of the Starr report for the last 36 hours? It has supposedly been under lock and key here. One can only assume the leaks are coming from the independent counsel’s office.”

She continued: “My second question is to you, Mr. Speaker: Why would you not afford the President of the United States the same opportunity you were given by the Ethics Committee of having almost a week’s advance notice to review the charges against you, and so that you could have your response be part of the report?”

Not alone in glaring double standard

Notably, Pelosi also asserted that Clinton had been exonerated because there were no criminal allegations against him in the Starr report, only discussions of what were essentially personal matters. She declared that our nation’s founders would be disappointed at the partisan investigation of a sitting president that threatened the very foundations of the nation.

Sadly, the speaker is not the only Democrat applying a different set of rules to President Trump than they felt were appropriate for Bill Clinton two decades ago. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) made strenuous objections to any redactions being made to the Mueller report, despite arguing the opposite in 1998, suggesting then that certain details of the Starr report needed to be shielded from public view “as a matter of decency.”

My, oh my, how things have changed over the past 20 years, yet remained so much the same. Democrats were self-serving hypocrites then, just as they are now.

695 Responses

  1. Hello to every body, it’s my first pay a quick visit of this web site; this weblog consists of amazing and truly fine stuff in support of readers.|

  2. Spot on with this write-up, I truly feel this website needs a lot more attention. I’ll probably be returning to see more, thanks for the information!

  3. The next time I read a blog, I hope that it doesn’t fail me as much as this particular one. I mean, I know it was my choice to read, however I actually believed you would probably have something useful to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you could fix if you weren’t too busy seeking attention.

  4. Whats up this is kinda of off topic but I was wanting to know if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding know-how so I wanted to get guidance from someone with experience. Any help would be greatly appreciated!|

  5. Sweet blog! I found it while browsing on Yahoo News. Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Appreciate it|

  6. My brother recommended I might like this web site. He was once entirely right. This put up actually made my day. You cann’t consider just how much time I had spent for this info! Thank you!|

  7. Good day! I could have sworn I’ve been to this web site before but after going through many of the articles I realized it’s new to me. Anyhow, I’m certainly pleased I stumbled upon it and I’ll be book-marking it and checking back often!

  8. Undeniably believe that which you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the internet the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people consider worries that they just don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks|

  9. Have you ever considered about adding a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is important and everything. However imagine if you added some great pictures or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and video clips, this site could undeniably be one of the most beneficial in its niche. Good blog!|

  10. Definitely consider that which you stated. Your favorite reason appeared to be at the web the simplest thing to understand of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed even as folks think about issues that they just do not realize about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the top and outlined out the entire thing without having side effect , other people could take a signal. Will likely be again to get more. Thanks|

  11. I’m amazed, I have to admit. Seldom do I encounter a blog that’s equally educative and interesting, and without a doubt, you have hit the nail on the head. The problem is something that too few people are speaking intelligently about. I am very happy I stumbled across this during my hunt for something regarding this.

  12. My partner and I absolutely love your blog and find nearly all of your post’s to be precisely what I’m looking for. Would you offer guest writers to write content for you? I wouldn’t mind composing a post or elaborating on many of the subjects you write about here. Again, awesome weblog!|

  13. I believe this is among the such a lot vital info for me. And i am happy reading your article. But want to statement on some common issues, The site taste is perfect, the articles is really great : D. Excellent process, cheers|

  14. An intriguing discussion is worth comment. I do think that you need to publish more about this subject matter, it may not be a taboo subject but usually people do not talk about these subjects. To the next! Many thanks!!

  15. What’s Taking place i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It absolutely helpful and it has helped me out loads. I hope to contribute & help different users like its helped me. Good job.|

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Popular