Trey Gowdy accuses DOJ of smearing staffer

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

There has been obvious contention in recent months as the House Intelligence Committee digs into the origins of the Trump/Russia collusion investigation and the Department of Justice seeks to protect sources, methods and their own investigations.

That conflict appears to have boiled over into attacks by anonymous DOJ officials against a key Intel committee staffer, published in The New York Times, and it has South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy fighting mad.

According to Fox News, the report from The Times alleged that an unnamed former DOJ official said Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein felt “misled” by a staffer named Kash Patel in regard to Patel’s travels to London to investigate Christopher Steele, author of the anti-Trump dossier.

That story in the Times also alleged that committee investigators like Patel were only concerned with “mining government secrets” that could be used as weapons against political enemies.

“I would have a lot more respect for DOJ or House committee Democrats if they would take out their frustrations on members of Congress, and leave staffers alone,” Gowdy told Fox on Monday.

“The members make the final decision and are responsible for them, not staffers,” Gowdy continued.

Gowdy praised Patel and added, “I benefit from him giving me the other side of the argument. He is a great career prosecutor and defense attorney. It is sad when you pick on staffers who are doing the right thing for their member or committee.”

Committee chair Devin Nunes joined Gowdy’s criticism and stated, “Attacking staffers, planting false stories, and endangering national security by leaking sensitive information to the press, including information about intelligence sources — this is what the DOJ is doing, and this why trust in the DOJ is rapidly eroding in Congress.”

Nunes also had high praise for Patel and called him “crucial” to the committee’s investigations and suspected his effectiveness was the reason for the attacks.

Even the DOJ seemed to try to distance themselves from the anonymous attacks in the Times, as per a statement from DOJ spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores.

“As Deputy Attorney General (Rod) Rosenstein has said repeatedly, we don’t put a lot of stock in anonymous sources over here and we are committed to continuing to work with Chairmen Gowdy and Nunes to accommodate their requests,” stated Flores.

[show_poll poll_id=184]

The New York Times, of course, stood by their anonymously sourced reporting and smears of the staffer.

249 Responses

  1. Your style is unique compared to other folks I have read stuff from. Thank you for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I will just bookmark this site.

  2. I am curious to find out what blog platform you are working with? I’m having some small security issues with my latest website and I would like to find something more safeguarded. Do you have any suggestions?

  3. Hey very nice blog!! Man .. Beautiful .. Superb .. I will bookmark your website and take the feeds also¡KI’m satisfied to search out so many useful info here within the put up, we’d like work out more strategies in this regard, thank you for sharing. . . . . .

  4. Good post. I learn something new and challenging on sites I stumbleupon every day. It will always be helpful to read through articles from other writers and practice a little something from other web sites.

  5. I was very happy to discover this great site. I wanted to thank you for your time just for this wonderful read!! I definitely liked every bit of it and i also have you bookmarked to see new stuff on your site.

  6. This is the right site for anyone who hopes to find out about this topic. You understand so much its almost tough to argue with you (not that I personally would want to…HaHa). You certainly put a brand new spin on a topic that has been written about for years. Excellent stuff, just wonderful!

  7. Good post. I learn one thing tougher on totally different blogs everyday. It would all the time be stimulating to learn content from different writers and follow a bit one thing from their store. I’d want to make use of some with the content material on my weblog whether or not you don’t mind. Natually I’ll offer you a hyperlink in your internet blog. Thanks for sharing.

  8. Get help to stop drinking. Helping women quit drinking alcohol. Coach Mary Wagstaff. Feel better, mind, body and soul. Mindfulness based coaching and alcohol recovery. Yoga for recovery.

  9. Spot on with this write-up, I absolutely think this amazing site needs a great deal more attention. I’ll probably be returning to read through more, thanks for the info!

  10. An interesting discussion is worth comment. I believe that you need to publish more about this topic, it might not be a taboo matter but generally people do not speak about such topics. To the next! Many thanks!!

  11. Hello would you mind letting me know which web host you’re working with? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 completely different browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot quicker then most. Can you recommend a good hosting provider at a honest price? Thanks, I appreciate it!

  12. I need to to thank you for this wonderful read!! I definitely enjoyed every little bit of it. I have got you saved as a favorite to look at new stuff you post…

  13. What i do not understood is in reality how you’re not actually much more well-appreciated than you may be now. You are very intelligent. You recognize therefore considerably with regards to this subject, produced me in my opinion imagine it from a lot of numerous angles. Its like men and women don’t seem to be fascinated except it is one thing to do with Girl gaga! Your own stuffs nice. At all times take care of it up!

  14. I blog often and I really thank you for your content. The article has truly peaked my interest. I am going to bookmark your blog and keep checking for new information about once per week. I subscribed to your Feed too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Popular