Trey Gowdy accuses DOJ of smearing staffer

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

There has been obvious contention in recent months as the House Intelligence Committee digs into the origins of the Trump/Russia collusion investigation and the Department of Justice seeks to protect sources, methods and their own investigations.

That conflict appears to have boiled over into attacks by anonymous DOJ officials against a key Intel committee staffer, published in The New York Times, and it has South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy fighting mad.

According to Fox News, the report from The Times alleged that an unnamed former DOJ official said Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein felt “misled” by a staffer named Kash Patel in regard to Patel’s travels to London to investigate Christopher Steele, author of the anti-Trump dossier.

That story in the Times also alleged that committee investigators like Patel were only concerned with “mining government secrets” that could be used as weapons against political enemies.

“I would have a lot more respect for DOJ or House committee Democrats if they would take out their frustrations on members of Congress, and leave staffers alone,” Gowdy told Fox on Monday.

“The members make the final decision and are responsible for them, not staffers,” Gowdy continued.

Gowdy praised Patel and added, “I benefit from him giving me the other side of the argument. He is a great career prosecutor and defense attorney. It is sad when you pick on staffers who are doing the right thing for their member or committee.”

Committee chair Devin Nunes joined Gowdy’s criticism and stated, “Attacking staffers, planting false stories, and endangering national security by leaking sensitive information to the press, including information about intelligence sources — this is what the DOJ is doing, and this why trust in the DOJ is rapidly eroding in Congress.”

Nunes also had high praise for Patel and called him “crucial” to the committee’s investigations and suspected his effectiveness was the reason for the attacks.

Even the DOJ seemed to try to distance themselves from the anonymous attacks in the Times, as per a statement from DOJ spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores.

“As Deputy Attorney General (Rod) Rosenstein has said repeatedly, we don’t put a lot of stock in anonymous sources over here and we are committed to continuing to work with Chairmen Gowdy and Nunes to accommodate their requests,” stated Flores.

[show_poll poll_id=184]

The New York Times, of course, stood by their anonymously sourced reporting and smears of the staffer.

132 Responses

  1. Next time I read a blog, Hopefully it doesn’t disappoint me as much as this one. After all, I know it was my choice to read through, nonetheless I genuinely believed you would probably have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something you could fix if you weren’t too busy searching for attention.

  2. Nice blog right here! Also your site loads up very fast! What host are you the use of? Can I am getting your affiliate hyperlink on your host? I desire my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  3. I’m impressed, I need to say. Really rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both educative and entertaining, and let me let you know, you have hit the nail on the head. Your concept is excellent; the problem is something that not enough individuals are talking intelligently about. I’m very completely satisfied that I stumbled across this in my search for something regarding this.

  4. I truly wanted to compose a quick comment so as to appreciate you for those precious points you are placing at this website. My incredibly long internet research has now been paid with reasonable knowledge to exchange with my friends. I would express that many of us website visitors actually are extremely blessed to be in a useful community with very many perfect professionals with valuable principles. I feel extremely fortunate to have discovered your entire web pages and look forward to tons of more entertaining times reading here. Thanks a lot once again for all the details.

  5. You are so awesome! I don’t suppose I’ve read through anything like this before. So great to discover someone with some genuine thoughts on this issue. Seriously.. thanks for starting this up. This website is one thing that is required on the internet, someone with a bit of originality!

  6. I’ve been surfing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all website owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the net will be much more useful than ever before.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Popular