Trump withdraws Ratcliffe from consideration for Intelligence Director

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

President Donald Trump has withdrawn Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) from consideration as Director of National Intelligence, citing media unfairness and Ratcliffe’s desire to stay in Congress, according to The Hill. Ratcliffe was accused by several in the media of being “too political” for the role and of padding his resume.

“Our great Republican Congressman John Ratcliffe is being treated very unfairly by the LameStream Media. Rather than going through months of slander and libel, I explained to John how miserable it would be for him and his family to deal with these people,” Trump tweeted.

Several key Republicans expressed doubts about Ratcliffe’s qualifications after the accusations. Ratcliffe had made public statements critical of the Mueller investigation that made some officials question whether he had the neutrality needed for the role.

Trump announced Ratcliffe was being considered for the role, but had not formally nominated him. A new pick will be announced soon, Trump said.

Ratcliffe’s Qualifications Questioned

News reports since Trump’s announcement of Ratcliffe for DNI accused the congressman of overstating parts of his resume about his work on terrorism cases as a federal prosecutor in Texas, leading to Republican and Democrat uncertainty about his nomination.

Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), who leads the Senate Intelligence Committee for the party, said Thursday it would be “clearly disqualifying” if it were true that Ratcliffe padded his resume.

Ratcliffe said that he asked Trump to withdraw the nomination because he didn’t want the debate around his nomination “however untrue, to become a purely political and partisan issue.”

According to the Daily Beast, there could be a further reason for withdrawing Ratcliffe’s nomination, however.

Whistleblower Questions

According to reports, an email about Ratcliffe’s involvement in a whistleblower case got to the White House just before Trump’s decision to withdraw Ratcliffe. According to the email, Ratcliffe may have tried to effect a reprisal against a whistleblower related to his campaign.

The letter stated that a non-profit that donated heavily to his campaign shut down a government cybersecurity office. It wasn’t clear how Ratcliffe was involved, but questions surrounding the incident remained.

Once the letter was circulated among Republicans, Ratcliffe lost enough support to cause Trump to withdraw him, with Ratcliffe’s cooperation and consent. Ratcliffe will remain in the Senate.

It looks like Trump might have dodged a bullet on this one.

132 Responses

  1. Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive learn something like this before. So nice to find anyone with some authentic thoughts on this subject. realy thanks for beginning this up. this website is something that’s needed on the net, somebody with a little originality. useful job for bringing something new to the internet!

  2. I blog often and I truly thank you for your content. The article has really peaked my interest. I will book mark your blog and keep checking for new information about once a week. I subscribed to your RSS feed as well.

  3. I seriously love your blog.. Excellent colors & theme. Did you build this amazing site yourself? Please reply back as I’m attempting to create my very own website and would love to know where you got this from or what the theme is called. Cheers!

  4. Having read this I believed it was really informative. I appreciate you spending some time and energy to put this short article together. I once again find myself personally spending way too much time both reading and posting comments. But so what, it was still worth it!

  5. You are so awesome! I do not suppose I’ve read through anything like this before. So good to find another person with a few unique thoughts on this subject. Really.. thank you for starting this up. This site is one thing that is required on the internet, someone with some originality!

  6. I haven’t checked in here for a while because I thought it was getting boring, but the last several posts are great quality so I guess I’ll add you back to my everyday bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

  7. obviously like your web site but you need to check the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Several of them are rife with spelling issues and I find it very bothersome to tell the truth nevertheless I’ll surely come back again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.