Trump withdraws Ratcliffe from consideration for Intelligence Director

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

President Donald Trump has withdrawn Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) from consideration as Director of National Intelligence, citing media unfairness and Ratcliffe’s desire to stay in Congress, according to The Hill. Ratcliffe was accused by several in the media of being “too political” for the role and of padding his resume.

“Our great Republican Congressman John Ratcliffe is being treated very unfairly by the LameStream Media. Rather than going through months of slander and libel, I explained to John how miserable it would be for him and his family to deal with these people,” Trump tweeted.

Several key Republicans expressed doubts about Ratcliffe’s qualifications after the accusations. Ratcliffe had made public statements critical of the Mueller investigation that made some officials question whether he had the neutrality needed for the role.

Trump announced Ratcliffe was being considered for the role, but had not formally nominated him. A new pick will be announced soon, Trump said.

Ratcliffe’s Qualifications Questioned

News reports since Trump’s announcement of Ratcliffe for DNI accused the congressman of overstating parts of his resume about his work on terrorism cases as a federal prosecutor in Texas, leading to Republican and Democrat uncertainty about his nomination.

Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), who leads the Senate Intelligence Committee for the party, said Thursday it would be “clearly disqualifying” if it were true that Ratcliffe padded his resume.

Ratcliffe said that he asked Trump to withdraw the nomination because he didn’t want the debate around his nomination “however untrue, to become a purely political and partisan issue.”

According to the Daily Beast, there could be a further reason for withdrawing Ratcliffe’s nomination, however.

Whistleblower Questions

According to reports, an email about Ratcliffe’s involvement in a whistleblower case got to the White House just before Trump’s decision to withdraw Ratcliffe. According to the email, Ratcliffe may have tried to effect a reprisal against a whistleblower related to his campaign.

The letter stated that a non-profit that donated heavily to his campaign shut down a government cybersecurity office. It wasn’t clear how Ratcliffe was involved, but questions surrounding the incident remained.

Once the letter was circulated among Republicans, Ratcliffe lost enough support to cause Trump to withdraw him, with Ratcliffe’s cooperation and consent. Ratcliffe will remain in the Senate.

It looks like Trump might have dodged a bullet on this one.

479 Responses

  1. I have to thank you for the efforts you have put in penning this blog. I’m hoping to view the same high-grade blog posts by you later on as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has encouraged me to get my very own site now ;)|

  2. I do consider all the concepts you’ve presented to your post. They’re really convincing and can definitely work. Still, the posts are very quick for novices. May just you please extend them a bit from subsequent time? Thank you for the post.

  3. Howdy! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a team of volunteers and starting a new project in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us useful information to work on. You have done a outstanding job!|

  4. We still cannot quite think We could come to be sort checking important points located on your blog post. My children and i are sincerely thankful to your generosity and with giving me possibility pursue our chosen profession path. Just you important information I of your web-site.

  5. Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this web site before but after browsing through some of the articles I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m certainly happy I found it and I’ll be book-marking it and checking back often!|

  6. I’m really inspired along with your writing abilities as neatly as with the layout to your weblog. Is this a paid subject or did you modify it yourself? Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it’s uncommon to peer a great blog like this one these days..|

  7. Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything similar to this prior to. So nice to uncover somebody with many original applying for grants this subject. realy appreciation for starting this up. this fabulous website is one area that is required on-line, someone with a bit of originality. useful project for bringing new things to the world wide web!

  8. We’re a bunch of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community. Your website provided us with useful info to work on. You’ve performed a formidable activity and our entire neighborhood will likely be grateful to you.

  9. Hey just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The text in your content seem to be running off the screen in Safari. I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know. The design and style look great though! Hope you get the issue fixed soon. Thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.