U.S. ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland offered up a juicy piece of unexpected testimony for Democrats on Wednesday in front of the House Intelligence Committee, claiming that “quid pro quo” did, in fact, take place on a phone call between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
But what most of the viewing public didn’t realize is that Sondland’s testimony, which most of the mainstream media immediately labeled as a “bombshell,” was not even as explosive as the fuse of a wet firecracker, as his spiel was entirely based on presumptions and may have been a method to distract from the possibility that he previously lied to Congress.
According to The Washington Examiner, while House Democrats originally believed that Sondland would be erring on the side of loyalty to Trump, they and the mainstream media were pleasantly surprised at Sondland’s opening statement, in which he made the big claim everyone on the left was waiting for.
“I know that members of this committee have frequently framed these complicated issues in the form of a simple question: Was there a “quid pro quo?” As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes,” Sondland said in his opening statement Wednesday.
But the problem is that a previous witness, diplomat William Taylor, said during his live testimony that he had new information from a staffer about a phone call that took place the day after the Trump-Zelenksky call occurred between Sondland and Trump.
The staffer claimed that Trump asked Sondland about “the investigations” in the July 26 phone call, which Sondland allegedly said in reply to the president that Ukraine was “ready to move forward.”
After Taylor relayed that new information in his live testimony, House Intel Committee members instantly recalled that Sondland failed to provide that tidbit of info in his closed-door, October 17 deposition. During his first deposition, Sondland claimed he “never” thought Trump attached any preconditions to a massive U.S. military aide package to Ukraine.
After several other witnesses reportedly claimed the contrary that Sondland did, in fact, tell Ukrainian officials that there was a precondition to receiving the aide package, Sondland later submitted a revised version of his testimony, calling into question his credibility right off the bat.
Even Democratic Rep. Raja Krishnamoorth said afterward that Sondland would have quite a bit of explaining to do when he took the stand on Wednesday, echoing accusations from other Democrats that he may have lied under oath in his original deposition. Mainstream media outlets also seized, questioning his credibility as a witness.
But what did Sondland do instead of explaining himself? He instantly erased all of that doubt and hate from the left and dropped that big, shiny quid pro quo “bombshell” minutes after he sat down for his live testimony and even tossed several other Trump administration members under the bus as being “in the loop” on the entire ordeal.
But the high from Sondland’s opening salvo was quickly diminished, as Republican members on the committee tore his credibility apart in thorough fashion, calling him out for the dozens upon dozens of times he “presumed” that quid pro quo actually took place, when in fact there was no solid evidence to prove such an occurrence.
“So, you really have no testimony today that ties President Trump to a scheme to withhold aid from Ukraine in exchange for these investigations?” Republican Rep. Mike Turner asked of Sondland.
“Other than my own presumption,” Sondland replied.
It’s not surprising that the mainstream media and Democratic members of the committee decided to let go of the fact that Sondland’s testimony and credibility fell apart faster than a wet paper bag and it’s not out the realm of possibility that Sondland played them like a fiddle to save his own behind.
Thank you, I have recently been looking for info about this subject for ages and yours is the greatest I’ve discovered so far. But, what about the bottom line? Are you sure about the source?
My spouse and I stumbled over here different website and thought I might check things out. I like what I see so now i’m following you. Look forward to going over your web page again.
Howdy would you mind letting me know which hosting company you’re working with? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 completely different browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot faster then most. Can you suggest a good internet hosting provider at a fair price? Thank you, I appreciate it!
Does your blog have a contact page? I’m having trouble locating it but, I’d like to shoot you an email. I’ve got some recommendations for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great site and I look forward to seeing it improve over time.
Do you mind if I quote a few of your posts as long as I provide credit and sources back to your website? My website is in the exact same niche as yours and my users would truly benefit from some of the information you present here. Please let me know if this alright with you. Appreciate it!
400496 627526An extremely interesting examine, I could possibly not concur entirely, but you do make some quite valid points. 44766
Hello there! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could find a captcha plugin for my comment form? I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having problems finding one? Thanks a lot!
Howdy! Someone in my Myspace group shared this website with us so I came to look it over. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Terrific blog and outstanding design and style.
There are some attention-grabbing closing dates in this article however I don’t know if I see all of them middle to heart. There’s some validity but I’ll take maintain opinion until I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we would like extra! Added to FeedBurner as well
I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your site. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme? Superb work!
F*ckin remarkable things here. Im very glad to see your article. Thanks a lot and i’m looking forward to contact you. Will you please drop me a e-mail?
297195 272431Thank you for your wonderful post! It has long been very valuable. I hope which you will proceed sharing your wisdom with us. 68033
Hi there! Someone in my Myspace group shared this site with us so I came to give it a look. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Great blog and brilliant design and style.
I enjoy what you guys are up too. Such clever work and coverage! Keep up the amazing works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my blogroll.