Conservative SCOTUS majority overturns 40-year-old precedent in sovereign immunity case

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

With the makeup of the Supreme Court now leaning toward the right with a 5-4 conservative majority, it was predicted that the court would be more likely to issue rulings that are in line with the plain text of the U.S. Constitution.

That appears to be true with regard to the court’s recent 5-4 ruling in the case of Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt, which overturned a prior decision from 40 years ago that the current court held was inconsistent with the principle of states’ sovereign immunity.

Overturning precedent

The high court ruled on Monday that a state could not be sued by a private party in a different state unless it had first consented to be sued.

That decision reversed a 1979 Supreme Court ruling in the case of Nevada v. Hall, which declared that the Constitution offered no protection to individual states from private lawsuits originating in other states.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion in the 5-4 decision. The four liberal justices were led in their dissenting opinion by Justice Stephen Breyer.

The liberal justices felt that prior court precedent should have been left alone and criticized the conservatives for overturning of a past ruling by a slim 5-4 majority, revealing their deeper concern that other longstanding precedents could be overturned in the future by a similarly narrow margin.

Thomas’ majority opinion

In the majority opinion, Thomas wrote that the 1979 ruling “misreads the historical record and misapprehends the ‘implicit ordering of relationships within the federal system necessary to make the Constitution a workable governing charter and to give each provision within that document the full effect intended by the Framers.'”

With regard to the precedent set in that case, Thomas wrote that it was “irreconcilable with our constitutional structure and with the historical evidence” which showed that states did enjoy sovereign immunity from private lawsuits

Broader implications?

The case at the heart of the court’s decision involved a dispute between a microchip inventor named Gilbert Hyatt who lived in Nevada and sued the California Franchise Tax Board in 1992.

Hyatt’s suit demanded that the tax agency compensate him for damages resulting from an audit it conducted on suspicion that Hyatt had moved from California to Nevada in order to avoid paying the state’s personal income tax. Hyatt alleged that the board shared personal information about him with business associates and unconstitutionally invaded his privacy.

This was actually the third time this particular case found its way to the Supreme Court, but it will almost assuredly be the last.

Now that the court has overturned its own prior ruling and found that Hyatt had no right to sue California from a Nevada courtroom absent its consent, liberal activists are left worrying about which other precedents may be vulnerable under fresh review.

1,958 Responses

  1. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this topic to be actually something that I think I would never understand. It seems too complex and very broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

  2. An outstanding share! I’ve just forwarded this onto a colleague who had been doing a little research on this. And he in fact ordered me breakfast due to the fact that I stumbled upon it for him… lol. So let me reword this…. Thanks for the meal!! But yeah, thanks for spending time to discuss this topic here on your site.

  3. Have you ever considered about including a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is fundamental and all. But just imagine if you added some great graphics or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and video clips, this site could definitely be one of the most beneficial in its field. Amazing blog!|

  4. I think this is one of the most vital info for me. And i am glad reading your article. But wanna remark on some general things, The web site style is wonderful, the articles is really great : D. Good job, cheers|

  5. Can I just say what a comfort to uncover somebody that really knows what they are talking about on the web. You actually realize how to bring a problem to light and make it important. More people need to look at this and understand this side of your story. It’s surprising you aren’t more popular given that you definitely possess the gift.

  6. Hi there, I found your site via Google even as looking for a related subject, your web site came up, it seems to be good. I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

  7. I do believe all the ideas you have offered for your post. They’re really convincing and will certainly work. Nonetheless, the posts are very brief for novices. May you please extend them a little from subsequent time? Thank you for the post.|

  8. Hey there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely glad I found it and I’ll be bookmarking and checking back frequently!|

  9. I just couldn’t depart your web site prior to suggesting that I really loved the standard information a person provide for your guests? Is going to be back continuously to inspect new posts|

  10. Quel que soit votre besoin, nous réalisons le référencement naturel de votre site afin de valoriser votre image, d’accroître sa visibilité et de le positionner en première page de Google. Besoin d’une agence de référencement naturel ? Consultez-nous !

  11. Howdy very nice web site!! Guy .. Excellent .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your web site and take the feeds also? I’m happy to find numerous helpful info here in the post, we’d like develop more strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .|

  12. Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it is truly informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. Ill appreciate if you continue this in future. A lot of people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  13. I have to thank you for the efforts you have put in penning this website. I really hope to check out the same high-grade blog posts by you in the future as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has motivated me to get my own site now 😉

  14. All the best with the fine related information right here on the web, it is a great small to medium sized test your net visitors. What person reported by below coverage? . . . .Fall in love with typically is unhurried, really like is almost certainly option. It not be jealous of, but there’s more talk, is not incredibly. It’s not necessarily irritating, itrrrs not self-seeking, it really isn’t successfully angered, it also blocks completely no list linked errors. Are fond of doesn’t necessarily relish hateful yet , rejoices when using the reason. This kind of be sure you satisfies, you should definitely trusts, be certain to hope, routinely perseveres.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Popular