Conservative SCOTUS majority overturns 40-year-old precedent in sovereign immunity case

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

With the makeup of the Supreme Court now leaning toward the right with a 5-4 conservative majority, it was predicted that the court would be more likely to issue rulings that are in line with the plain text of the U.S. Constitution.

That appears to be true with regard to the court’s recent 5-4 ruling in the case of Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt, which overturned a prior decision from 40 years ago that the current court held was inconsistent with the principle of states’ sovereign immunity.

Overturning precedent

The high court ruled on Monday that a state could not be sued by a private party in a different state unless it had first consented to be sued.

That decision reversed a 1979 Supreme Court ruling in the case of Nevada v. Hall, which declared that the Constitution offered no protection to individual states from private lawsuits originating in other states.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion in the 5-4 decision. The four liberal justices were led in their dissenting opinion by Justice Stephen Breyer.

The liberal justices felt that prior court precedent should have been left alone and criticized the conservatives for overturning of a past ruling by a slim 5-4 majority, revealing their deeper concern that other longstanding precedents could be overturned in the future by a similarly narrow margin.

Thomas’ majority opinion

In the majority opinion, Thomas wrote that the 1979 ruling “misreads the historical record and misapprehends the ‘implicit ordering of relationships within the federal system necessary to make the Constitution a workable governing charter and to give each provision within that document the full effect intended by the Framers.'”

With regard to the precedent set in that case, Thomas wrote that it was “irreconcilable with our constitutional structure and with the historical evidence” which showed that states did enjoy sovereign immunity from private lawsuits

Broader implications?

The case at the heart of the court’s decision involved a dispute between a microchip inventor named Gilbert Hyatt who lived in Nevada and sued the California Franchise Tax Board in 1992.

Hyatt’s suit demanded that the tax agency compensate him for damages resulting from an audit it conducted on suspicion that Hyatt had moved from California to Nevada in order to avoid paying the state’s personal income tax. Hyatt alleged that the board shared personal information about him with business associates and unconstitutionally invaded his privacy.

This was actually the third time this particular case found its way to the Supreme Court, but it will almost assuredly be the last.

Now that the court has overturned its own prior ruling and found that Hyatt had no right to sue California from a Nevada courtroom absent its consent, liberal activists are left worrying about which other precedents may be vulnerable under fresh review.

855 Responses

  1. I seriously love your blog.. Great colors & theme. Did you create this web site yourself? Please reply back as I’m attempting to create my own site and would like to find out where you got this from or just what the theme is named. Many thanks!

  2. Thanks for one’s marvelous posting! I certainly enjoyed reading it, you’re a great author.I will be sure to bookmark your blog and will eventually come back later in life. I want to encourage you continue your great work, have a nice weekend!|

  3. When I originally left a comment I appear to have clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and from now on whenever a comment is added I receive 4 emails with the same comment. Is there a way you can remove me from that service? Thank you!

  4. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be really something that I think I would never understand. It seems too complex and very broad for me. I am looking forward for your next post, I’ll try to get the hang of it!|

  5. It is really a great and helpful piece of information. I am glad that you shared this useful information with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  6. Thank you a bunch for sharing this with all folks you really understand what you’re speaking about! Bookmarked. Please also visit my web site =). We could have a link alternate agreement among us|

  7. You’re so interesting! I do not think I have read anything like that before. So good to discover someone with original thoughts on this subject. Seriously.. thanks for starting this up. This web site is one thing that’s needed on the web, someone with a bit of originality!|

  8. Wonderful beat ! I wish to apprentice whilst you amend your website, how can i subscribe for a weblog web site? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I were a little bit familiar of this your broadcast offered shiny clear idea|

  9. Excellent post. I was checking continuously this weblog and I am impressed! Very useful info specially the closing part 🙂 I handle such information much. I used to be seeking this particular information for a long time. Thanks and good luck. |

  10. Interesting blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A design like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my blog jump out. Please let me know where you got your theme. Cheers|

  11. An outstanding share! I’ve just forwarded this onto a coworker who had been conducting a little research on this. And he in fact bought me lunch because I found it for him… lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanx for spending time to talk about this subject here on your website.

  12. Hi there, just turned into alert to your blog through Google, and found that it is really informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I will be grateful when you proceed this in future. Lots of folks can be benefited out of your writing. Cheers!|

  13. An outstanding share! I’ve just forwarded this onto a coworker who had been doing a little research on this. And he in fact ordered me dinner because I stumbled upon it for him… lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanks for spending some time to discuss this matter here on your site.|

  14. Hey just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know a few of the pictures aren’t loading properly. I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different internet browsers and both show the same outcome.|

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Popular