NYT-Mueller insider confirms Buzzfeed’s bombshell Michael Cohen report was false

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

Buzzfeed — the same outlet that first published the largely debunked and discredited Christopher Steele dossier in 2016 — released yet another anti-Trump “bombshell” story on Thursday that was revealed to be a complete dud less than 24 hours later. That story alleged that Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation had evidence that President Donald Trump had instructed former attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress.

Much of the media ran wild with the story for the day, speculating broadly about the impeachment or resignation that could result from the story “if true” (no other media outlet could confirm Buzzfeed’s “scoop”) — that is, until a spokesman for Mueller released a surprising statement totally debunking the Buzzfeed allegation, and insiders like a New York Times source close to the Mueller probe confirmed that Buzzfeed’s story was wrong.

The Times contradicts Buzzfeed report

The New York Times — who somewhat surprisingly refrained from jumping on the “we’ve got him now!” bandwagon with the Buzzfeed story — released a story of their own Friday night that cited an anonymous insider “familiar with” Cohen’s testimony to the special counsel, who suggested that Cohen had never said that Trump had instructed him to lie to Congress.

The New York Times has not independently confirmed the BuzzFeed report,” the article from The Times noted. “One person familiar with Mr. Cohen’s testimony to the special counsel’s prosecutors said that Mr. Cohen did not state that the president had pressured him to lie to Congress.”

The Times also shared the official statement released by a spokesman for Mueller’s investigation, Peter Carr, who said:

BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the special counsel’s office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s congressional testimony are not accurate.

The Times further noted: “The statement by Mr. Carr, the special counsel’s spokesman, was unusual because it appeared to be the first time he had publicly challenged the facts of a news media account that had generated significant attention for its revelations about the president.”

A significant rebuttal

There was indeed “significant attention” given to the Buzzfeed story — and not just by the typical Trump-hating media outlets and personalities.

A number of elected Democrat officials, many of whom seemed to almost salivate at the mere thought that the president had finally been caught committing an impeachable offense — in this case, actual obstruction of justice by virtue of suborned perjury — also made note of the story in TV appearances and on social media.

But just as “significant” as the attention paid to the Buzzfeed story was the rebuttal it received from the Mueller probe, which — as duly noted by the Times — hasn’t exactly been outspoken in the past about knocking down the many “fake news” bombshells that have proven to be duds over the past year or so.

Rare skepticism from the NYT

Perhaps as surprising as the Mueller probe statement was the restraint shown by the Times in choosing not to run with the Buzzfeed story, which was noted by National Review‘s Kyle Smith before the Times ran their report undercutting Buzzfeed’s article.

After first laying out how these big bombshell stories usually are treated by the rest of the media — they first “pickup” the initial report while quietly attempting to “match” it with their own reports — Smith noted that “the New York Times’ response has been not what I would have expected. So far, on its site, the only indication I can find that the Times even acknowledges that the BuzzFeed story exists is this Associated Press story, which doesn’t even pop up on the main page or the politics page.”

Smith further noted that The Washington Post had several stories based on the Buzzfeed bombshell on their main page, and revealed that he knew reporters for the Times were working to “match” the original story. “But in the meantime,” he wrote, “you would expect them to at least run a big story on the homepage saying, ‘Report claims Trump directed Cohen to lie to Congress.’ They haven’t done that. To me that says the New York Times is skeptical about either this story in particular, or BuzzFeed in general, or both.”

[show_poll poll_id=1283]

Skepticism is a good way to treat most of the “bombshell” anti-Trump stories that come out every week or so, as the overwhelming majority of them quickly prove to be non-explosive duds, or worse: manufactured “fake news.”

Skepticism toward Buzzfeed is especially good, as well, given their prior track record of publishing unverified and uncorroborated “fake news” about the president — something the Times seemed to get this time, while the rest of the media eagerly took the bait and ran with it.

499 Responses

  1. I do accept as true with all the concepts you have offered on your post. They’re really convincing and will definitely work. Still, the posts are too brief for starters. May just you please lengthen them a little from next time? Thanks for the post.

  2. we are a company located in humboldt county CA we have a large selection of top shelf marijuana strains, we also have vapes, edibles and more. Our customers are our top priority, please contact us if you have questions like where to buy cannabis online in restricted states/countries.

  3. I blog frequently and I really appreciate your information. The article has really peaked my interest. I’m going to book mark your website and keep checking for new information about once per week. I opted in for your Feed as well.

  4. An interesting discussion is definitely worth comment. I do believe that you need to publish more on this subject, it might not be a taboo subject but generally folks don’t discuss these issues. To the next! Best wishes!!

  5. I absolutely love your blog.. Great colors & theme. Did you make this site yourself? Please reply back as I’m hoping to create my own site and would like to find out where you got this from or what the theme is called. Cheers!

  6. I blog frequently and I truly appreciate your information. This article has truly peaked my interest. I’m going to book mark your website and keep checking for new details about once a week. I opted in for your Feed as well.

  7. Having read this I thought it was very enlightening. I appreciate you taking the time and effort to put this content together. I once again find myself personally spending way too much time both reading and posting comments. But so what, it was still worth it!

  8. Having read this I believed it was really informative. I appreciate you taking the time and effort to put this article together. I once again find myself personally spending way too much time both reading and leaving comments. But so what, it was still worth it!

  9. At this time it sounds like Drupal is the preferred blogging platform available right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what you are using on your blog?

  10. Howdy, I do think your site could be having web browser compatibility issues. When I look at your web site in Safari, it looks fine however when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping issues. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other than that, wonderful website!

  11. May I simply just say what a comfort to uncover someone that actually knows what they are talking about on the net. You actually realize how to bring a problem to light and make it important. More and more people need to read this and understand this side of your story. I was surprised you aren’t more popular because you most certainly have the gift.

  12. You are so awesome! I don’t suppose I have read through a single thing like this before. So nice to find somebody with a few unique thoughts on this topic. Seriously.. thank you for starting this up. This site is something that’s needed on the web, someone with a little originality!

  13. Oh my goodness! Amazing article dude! Many thanks, However I am going through troubles with your RSS. I don’t understand why I cannot join it. Is there anybody getting the same RSS issues? Anyone who knows the solution can you kindly respond? Thanx!!

  14. The very next time I read a blog, I hope that it doesn’t fail me just as much as this particular one. I mean, Yes, it was my choice to read through, however I truly thought you would probably have something useful to say. All I hear is a bunch of complaining about something that you could possibly fix if you were not too busy looking for attention.

  15. I blog frequently and I seriously appreciate your information. The article has really peaked my interest. I am going to bookmark your website and keep checking for new details about once a week. I subscribed to your RSS feed as well.

  16. May I simply just say what a comfort to uncover somebody who genuinely knows what they are discussing over the internet. You definitely understand how to bring an issue to light and make it important. A lot more people should read this and understand this side of the story. It’s surprising you aren’t more popular because you certainly have the gift.

  17. I was more than happy to uncover this great site. I want to to thank you for your time due to this wonderful read!! I definitely savored every little bit of it and I have you saved as a favorite to look at new things in your web site.

  18. I was pretty pleased to uncover this page. I wanted to thank you for your time for this particularly fantastic read!! I definitely loved every little bit of it and i also have you book marked to see new information in your web site.

  19. Aw, this was a very good post. Spending some time and actual effort to create a top notch article… but what can I say… I hesitate a lot and never seem to get nearly anything done.

  20. The next time I read a blog, Hopefully it does not fail me just as much as this one. I mean, Yes, it was my choice to read through, however I truly believed you would probably have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of crying about something you could possibly fix if you were not too busy looking for attention.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Popular