NYT-Mueller insider confirms Buzzfeed’s bombshell Michael Cohen report was false

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

Buzzfeed — the same outlet that first published the largely debunked and discredited Christopher Steele dossier in 2016 — released yet another anti-Trump “bombshell” story on Thursday that was revealed to be a complete dud less than 24 hours later. That story alleged that Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation had evidence that President Donald Trump had instructed former attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress.

Much of the media ran wild with the story for the day, speculating broadly about the impeachment or resignation that could result from the story “if true” (no other media outlet could confirm Buzzfeed’s “scoop”) — that is, until a spokesman for Mueller released a surprising statement totally debunking the Buzzfeed allegation, and insiders like a New York Times source close to the Mueller probe confirmed that Buzzfeed’s story was wrong.

The Times contradicts Buzzfeed report

The New York Times — who somewhat surprisingly refrained from jumping on the “we’ve got him now!” bandwagon with the Buzzfeed story — released a story of their own Friday night that cited an anonymous insider “familiar with” Cohen’s testimony to the special counsel, who suggested that Cohen had never said that Trump had instructed him to lie to Congress.

The New York Times has not independently confirmed the BuzzFeed report,” the article from The Times noted. “One person familiar with Mr. Cohen’s testimony to the special counsel’s prosecutors said that Mr. Cohen did not state that the president had pressured him to lie to Congress.”

The Times also shared the official statement released by a spokesman for Mueller’s investigation, Peter Carr, who said:

BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the special counsel’s office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s congressional testimony are not accurate.

The Times further noted: “The statement by Mr. Carr, the special counsel’s spokesman, was unusual because it appeared to be the first time he had publicly challenged the facts of a news media account that had generated significant attention for its revelations about the president.”

A significant rebuttal

There was indeed “significant attention” given to the Buzzfeed story — and not just by the typical Trump-hating media outlets and personalities.

A number of elected Democrat officials, many of whom seemed to almost salivate at the mere thought that the president had finally been caught committing an impeachable offense — in this case, actual obstruction of justice by virtue of suborned perjury — also made note of the story in TV appearances and on social media.

But just as “significant” as the attention paid to the Buzzfeed story was the rebuttal it received from the Mueller probe, which — as duly noted by the Times — hasn’t exactly been outspoken in the past about knocking down the many “fake news” bombshells that have proven to be duds over the past year or so.

Rare skepticism from the NYT

Perhaps as surprising as the Mueller probe statement was the restraint shown by the Times in choosing not to run with the Buzzfeed story, which was noted by National Review‘s Kyle Smith before the Times ran their report undercutting Buzzfeed’s article.

After first laying out how these big bombshell stories usually are treated by the rest of the media — they first “pickup” the initial report while quietly attempting to “match” it with their own reports — Smith noted that “the New York Times’ response has been not what I would have expected. So far, on its site, the only indication I can find that the Times even acknowledges that the BuzzFeed story exists is this Associated Press story, which doesn’t even pop up on the main page or the politics page.”

Smith further noted that The Washington Post had several stories based on the Buzzfeed bombshell on their main page, and revealed that he knew reporters for the Times were working to “match” the original story. “But in the meantime,” he wrote, “you would expect them to at least run a big story on the homepage saying, ‘Report claims Trump directed Cohen to lie to Congress.’ They haven’t done that. To me that says the New York Times is skeptical about either this story in particular, or BuzzFeed in general, or both.”

[show_poll poll_id=1283]

Skepticism is a good way to treat most of the “bombshell” anti-Trump stories that come out every week or so, as the overwhelming majority of them quickly prove to be non-explosive duds, or worse: manufactured “fake news.”

Skepticism toward Buzzfeed is especially good, as well, given their prior track record of publishing unverified and uncorroborated “fake news” about the president — something the Times seemed to get this time, while the rest of the media eagerly took the bait and ran with it.

499 Responses

  1. Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it.
    Look advanced to more added agreeable from you! By the way, how can we communicate?

  2. I’m the owner of JustCBD brand (justcbdstore.com) and am looking to develop my wholesale side of business. I am hoping someone at targetdomain is able to provide some guidance 🙂 I considered that the most suitable way to accomplish this would be to reach out to vape companies and cbd stores. I was hoping if anyone could suggest a qualified site where I can get CBD Shops B2B Data I am presently examining creativebeartech.com, theeliquidboutique.co.uk and wowitloveithaveit.com. Unsure which one would be the most ideal selection and would appreciate any advice on this. Or would it be much simpler for me to scrape my own leads? Suggestions?

  3. Pingback: Dissertations
  4. I seriously love your website.. Excellent colors & theme. Did you develop this web site yourself? Please reply back as I’m trying to create my own website and want to learn where you got this from or exactly what the theme is called. Many thanks!

  5. Spot on with this write-up, I truly believe this web site needs much more attention. I’ll probably be returning to read through more, thanks for the information!

  6. You’re so awesome! I don’t suppose I’ve truly read through something like this before. So good to find someone with some unique thoughts on this subject matter. Really.. many thanks for starting this up. This website is one thing that is required on the internet, someone with a bit of originality!

  7. I simply want to mention I am just beginner to blogging and certainly savored you’re web blog. Probably I’m planning to bookmark your site . You absolutely have wonderful posts. Cheers for sharing with us your web site.

  8. I just want to tell you that I am new to blogging and site-building and definitely enjoyed this web-site. Very likely I’m want to bookmark your website . You absolutely come with fabulous well written articles. Regards for sharing with us your website page.

  9. Woah! I’m really loving the template/theme of this website. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s challenging to get that “perfect balance” between user friendliness and visual appeal. I must say you’ve done a excellent job with this. Additionally, the blog loads very quick for me on Internet explorer. Excellent Blog!

  10. Natural Releaf CBD | New York CBD Store with locations in Murray Hill, NY | Upper East Side, NY | White Plains, NY Serving New York City, NY and Westchester, NY High Quality CBD Products With Lab Test

  11. A person essentially help to make seriously posts I would state. This is the very first time I frequented your website page and thus far? I amazed with the research you made to create this particular publish amazing. Magnificent job!

  12. Howdy are using WordPress for your blog platform? I’m new to the blog world but I’m trying to get started and set up my own. Do you require any html coding expertise to make your own blog? Any help would be really appreciated!

  13. I¡¦ve been exploring for a little for any high quality articles or blog posts on this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo I finally stumbled upon this site. Reading this info So i¡¦m glad to convey that I have an incredibly just right uncanny feeling I discovered just what I needed. I such a lot surely will make certain to do not fail to remember this site and provides it a look on a constant basis.

  14. You really make it seem so easy together with your presentation however I in finding this matter to be actually something which I think I might by no means understand. It sort of feels too complex and extremely broad for me. I’m having a look ahead for your subsequent put up, I¡¦ll try to get the grasp of it!

  15. Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your blog and in accession capital to claim that I acquire in fact enjoyed account your blog posts. Anyway I’ll be subscribing for your augment or even I achievement you get admission to persistently rapidly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Popular