Trey Gowdy accuses DOJ of smearing staffer

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

There has been obvious contention in recent months as the House Intelligence Committee digs into the origins of the Trump/Russia collusion investigation and the Department of Justice seeks to protect sources, methods and their own investigations.

That conflict appears to have boiled over into attacks by anonymous DOJ officials against a key Intel committee staffer, published in The New York Times, and it has South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy fighting mad.

According to Fox News, the report from The Times alleged that an unnamed former DOJ official said Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein felt “misled” by a staffer named Kash Patel in regard to Patel’s travels to London to investigate Christopher Steele, author of the anti-Trump dossier.

That story in the Times also alleged that committee investigators like Patel were only concerned with “mining government secrets” that could be used as weapons against political enemies.

“I would have a lot more respect for DOJ or House committee Democrats if they would take out their frustrations on members of Congress, and leave staffers alone,” Gowdy told Fox on Monday.

“The members make the final decision and are responsible for them, not staffers,” Gowdy continued.

Gowdy praised Patel and added, “I benefit from him giving me the other side of the argument. He is a great career prosecutor and defense attorney. It is sad when you pick on staffers who are doing the right thing for their member or committee.”

Committee chair Devin Nunes joined Gowdy’s criticism and stated, “Attacking staffers, planting false stories, and endangering national security by leaking sensitive information to the press, including information about intelligence sources — this is what the DOJ is doing, and this why trust in the DOJ is rapidly eroding in Congress.”

Nunes also had high praise for Patel and called him “crucial” to the committee’s investigations and suspected his effectiveness was the reason for the attacks.

Even the DOJ seemed to try to distance themselves from the anonymous attacks in the Times, as per a statement from DOJ spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores.

“As Deputy Attorney General (Rod) Rosenstein has said repeatedly, we don’t put a lot of stock in anonymous sources over here and we are committed to continuing to work with Chairmen Gowdy and Nunes to accommodate their requests,” stated Flores.

[show_poll poll_id=184]

The New York Times, of course, stood by their anonymously sourced reporting and smears of the staffer.

514 Responses

  1. I think this is one of the most significant information for me. And i am glad reading your article. But should remark on some general things, The site style is perfect, the articles is really nice : D. Good job, cheers

  2. Woah! I’m really digging the template/theme of this website. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s very difficult to get that “perfect balance” between user friendliness and appearance. I must say you’ve done a excellent job with this. Additionally, the blog loads super fast for me on Safari. Superb Blog!

  3. You are so awesome! I do not believe I’ve read something like this before. So nice to discover someone with a few original thoughts on this topic. Really.. thank you for starting this up. This web site is one thing that’s needed on the internet, someone with a little originality!

  4. I have been exploring for a bit for any high-quality articles or weblog posts in this kind of space . Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled upon this site. Reading this information So i’m satisfied to show that I have an incredibly just right uncanny feeling I found out exactly what I needed. I such a lot without a doubt will make certain to do not overlook this web site and provides it a look on a continuing basis.

  5. Your style is very unique in comparison to other folks I have read stuff from. I appreciate you for posting when you’ve got the opportunity, Guess I’ll just bookmark this web site.

  6. I’m amazed, I have to admit. Rarely do I come across a blog that’s both equally educative and amusing, and without a doubt, you have hit the nail on the head. The issue is something that not enough men and women are speaking intelligently about. I am very happy I came across this in my search for something regarding this.

  7. Oh my goodness! Incredible article dude! Many thanks, However I am experiencing troubles with your RSS. I don’t understand why I cannot subscribe to it. Is there anybody having identical RSS problems? Anybody who knows the answer will you kindly respond? Thanks!!

  8. I wish to express appreciation to the writer for rescuing me from this instance. Right after researching throughout the the net and getting advice which were not productive, I believed my life was over. Living without the presence of approaches to the issues you’ve resolved as a result of this guideline is a critical case, and those which might have negatively affected my career if I hadn’t come across the website. Your own mastery and kindness in playing with the whole lot was precious. I am not sure what I would’ve done if I hadn’t come across such a stuff like this. It’s possible to at this time relish my future. Thank you very much for this reliable and results-oriented guide. I will not think twice to suggest your site to any person who desires recommendations about this issue.

  9. Thanks for sharing excellent informations. Your web-site is so cool. I am impressed by the details that you’ve on this blog. It reveals how nicely you understand this subject. Bookmarked this website page, will come back for more articles. You, my pal, ROCK! I found simply the info I already searched all over the place and just could not come across. What a perfect website.

  10. Having read this I believed it was rather informative. I appreciate you taking the time and effort to put this article together. I once again find myself spending way too much time both reading and commenting. But so what, it was still worth it!

  11. There are some fascinating cut-off dates in this article however I dont know if I see all of them middle to heart. There may be some validity however I will take maintain opinion until I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we want extra! Added to FeedBurner as properly

  12. Aw, this was an exceptionally nice post. Finding the time and actual effort to generate a great article… but what can I say… I procrastinate a lot and don’t seem to get anything done.

  13. There are actually quite a lot of details like that to take into consideration. That is a nice point to carry up. I offer the ideas above as normal inspiration however clearly there are questions like the one you carry up where crucial factor might be working in trustworthy good faith. I don?t know if finest practices have emerged around issues like that, but I’m certain that your job is clearly recognized as a good game. Each girls and boys really feel the impact of just a second’s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.

  14. I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get bought an impatience over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again as exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this hike.

  15. Heya i am for the first time here. I came across this board and I in finding It truly useful & it helped me out much. I hope to offer something again and aid others like you helped me.

  16. With havin so much content do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright violation? My blog has a lot of completely unique content I’ve either authored myself or outsourced but it looks like a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my permission. Do you know any solutions to help prevent content from being ripped off? I’d genuinely appreciate it.

  17. I do consider all of the concepts you’ve presented to your post. They’re really convincing and can certainly work. Still, the posts are very brief for starters. May just you please prolong them a bit from next time? Thank you for the post.

  18. we are a company located in humboldt county CA we have a large selection of top shelf marijuana strains, we also have vapes, edibles and more. Our customers are our top priority, please contact us if you have questions like where to buy cannabis online in restricted states/countries.

  19. I have to show some appreciation to the writer for bailing me out of such a circumstance. Right after surfing around through the the web and coming across proposals which are not powerful, I thought my life was well over. Living without the presence of approaches to the issues you’ve sorted out by way of your entire blog post is a crucial case, as well as ones that might have badly affected my entire career if I had not discovered your web site. The competence and kindness in maneuvering every part was very helpful. I am not sure what I would’ve done if I had not come upon such a stuff like this. I can also at this point relish my future. Thanks a lot very much for this specialized and amazing help. I won’t be reluctant to refer your web page to anybody who requires guidelines on this area.

  20. I was very pleased to discover this site. I wanted to thank you for ones time due to this fantastic read!! I definitely loved every bit of it and i also have you book marked to check out new information on your site.

  21. Wow that was unusual. I just wrote an really long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn’t appear. Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again. Anyhow, just wanted to say great blog!

  22. Spot on with this write-up, I seriously believe this website needs a great deal more attention. I’ll probably be returning to read through more, thanks for the info!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Popular