DOJ uses Nancy Pelosi’s own words to undermine Dems’ demand for Mueller materials

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

When it was revealed after two years of investigation that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s final report was a dud that wouldn’t result in the impeachment of President Donald Trump, the House Judiciary Committee led by Jerry Nadler (D-NY) shifted gears and demanded that all of the secret grand jury materials compiled during Mueller’s probe be turned over in hopes that impeachable offenses would be found.

The committee filed a petition in court requesting complete access to the unredacted grand jury materials, but a stunning counterargument filed by Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys in opposition to that request not only destroyed the entire premise of Nadler’s request, it also used quotes from Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to do so.

Document dispute

Justice Department attorneys argued in their filing that the Nadler-led committee should not be given access to the secret grand jury materials for several reasons, but particularly in light of the fact that House Democrats themselves couldn’t even agree on why such material was needed or how it would be used.

The position put forward by the committee was that the grand jury materials were needed in order for the committee to determine whether or not to move forward with official impeachment proceedings, which in its view qualified as a “judicial proceeding” for which grand jury materials could legally be released.

The DOJ lawyers countered by contending at length in their 46-page filing that impeachment proceedings were not the same as “judicial proceedings,” and even if they were, the committee had yet to actually head down the impeachment road just yet, much less show a “particularized need” for the secret grand jury materials.

Not a judicial proceeding

Ironically, the DOJ attorneys cited remarks from Speaker Pelosi to undermine Nadler’s claim of an ongoing impeachment proceeding requiring and permitting the release of the secret grand jury materials.

“The Committee’s own description of its investigation makes clear that it is too far removed from any potential judicial proceeding to qualify,” the DOJ lawyers wrote in the introduction to their response to Nadler’s request.

“As the Committee’s Chairman has stressed — and as the Speaker of the House and the House Majority Leader both reiterated this week — the purpose of its investigation is to assess numerous possible remedial measures, including censure, articles of impeachment, legislation, Constitutional amendments, and more.”

Words coming back to haunt them

Later in the DOJ filing, in a section meant to address the semantic games Democrats such as Nadler were playing with regard to “impeachment proceedings,” the DOJ lawyers more specifically quoted Pelosi to weaken those claims.

“Most prominently, the Speaker of the House has been emphatic that the investigation is not a true impeachment proceeding. On the same day the House adopted the resolution that the Committee claims authorized this suit, the Speaker told a reporter the House Democrat caucus was ‘not even close’ to an ‘impeachment inquiry,'” the DOJ noted.

“More recently, she has said, ‘I do know that we’ve been on a path of investigation and that includes the possibility of legislation or impeachment,'” the attorneys added, and threw in a quote from House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer for good measure. “And the House Majority Leader had even explained that branding the Committee’s proceeding as ‘impeachment’ is a simply a device to enhance the Committee’s legal arguments in this and other courts.”

In other words, despite Nadler’s assertions to the contrary, House Democrats aren’t officially impeaching President Trump yet, and even if they were, they still wouldn’t qualify for an exemption to the rules governing the secrecy of grand jury materials. The fact that the DOJ attorneys utilized quotes from Nadler’s superiors in the House to help make that case only served as hilariously ironic icing on this particular cake.

842 Responses

  1. An impressive share! I’ve just forwarded this onto a colleague who had been conducting a little homework on this. And he in fact ordered me lunch simply because I found it for him… lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanks for spending some time to discuss this issue here on your internet site.

  2. May I just say what a comfort to find an individual who actually knows what they are discussing on the internet. You actually realize how to bring a problem to light and make it important. More people should check this out and understand this side of your story. I can’t believe you are not more popular given that you certainly possess the gift.

  3. Howdy, I believe your blog may be having browser compatibility issues. Whenever I take a look at your site in Safari, it looks fine however when opening in I.E., it’s got some overlapping issues. I merely wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other than that, wonderful website!

  4. Hi! I could have sworn I’ve visited this blog before but after looking at many of the posts I realized it’s new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely pleased I came across it and I’ll be book-marking it and checking back regularly!

  5. I really love your blog.. Excellent colors & theme. Did you make this web site yourself? Please reply back as I’m looking to create my very own blog and would love to find out where you got this from or what the theme is called. Thank you!

  6. Hi, I do think this is a great blog. I stumbledupon it 😉 I will revisit once again since I book marked it. Money and freedom is the greatest way to change, may you be rich and continue to guide others.

  7. A fascinating discussion is definitely worth comment. I believe that you need to publish more on this issue, it may not be a taboo subject but usually people do not speak about these issues. To the next! Many thanks!!

  8. You are so interesting! I do not suppose I’ve truly read through a single thing like this before. So nice to find another person with a few original thoughts on this subject. Seriously.. thanks for starting this up. This web site is something that’s needed on the web, someone with a little originality!

  9. Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The text in your post seem to be running off the screen in Opera. I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know. The style and design look great though! Hope you get the issue fixed soon. Kudos

  10. Right here is the right site for everyone who wishes to understand this topic. You understand a whole lot its almost tough to argue with you (not that I actually would want to…HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a topic which has been written about for ages. Wonderful stuff, just great!

  11. Oh my goodness! Impressive article dude! Thanks, However I am encountering difficulties with your RSS. I don’t know why I am unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody having similar RSS issues? Anybody who knows the solution will you kindly respond? Thanks!!

  12. I’m pretty pleased to uncover this great site. I wanted to thank you for ones time for this wonderful read!! I definitely loved every little bit of it and I have you saved as a favorite to check out new information in your blog.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.