DOJ uses Nancy Pelosi’s own words to undermine Dems’ demand for Mueller materials

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

When it was revealed after two years of investigation that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s final report was a dud that wouldn’t result in the impeachment of President Donald Trump, the House Judiciary Committee led by Jerry Nadler (D-NY) shifted gears and demanded that all of the secret grand jury materials compiled during Mueller’s probe be turned over in hopes that impeachable offenses would be found.

The committee filed a petition in court requesting complete access to the unredacted grand jury materials, but a stunning counterargument filed by Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys in opposition to that request not only destroyed the entire premise of Nadler’s request, it also used quotes from Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to do so.

Document dispute

Justice Department attorneys argued in their filing that the Nadler-led committee should not be given access to the secret grand jury materials for several reasons, but particularly in light of the fact that House Democrats themselves couldn’t even agree on why such material was needed or how it would be used.

The position put forward by the committee was that the grand jury materials were needed in order for the committee to determine whether or not to move forward with official impeachment proceedings, which in its view qualified as a “judicial proceeding” for which grand jury materials could legally be released.

The DOJ lawyers countered by contending at length in their 46-page filing that impeachment proceedings were not the same as “judicial proceedings,” and even if they were, the committee had yet to actually head down the impeachment road just yet, much less show a “particularized need” for the secret grand jury materials.

Not a judicial proceeding

Ironically, the DOJ attorneys cited remarks from Speaker Pelosi to undermine Nadler’s claim of an ongoing impeachment proceeding requiring and permitting the release of the secret grand jury materials.

“The Committee’s own description of its investigation makes clear that it is too far removed from any potential judicial proceeding to qualify,” the DOJ lawyers wrote in the introduction to their response to Nadler’s request.

“As the Committee’s Chairman has stressed — and as the Speaker of the House and the House Majority Leader both reiterated this week — the purpose of its investigation is to assess numerous possible remedial measures, including censure, articles of impeachment, legislation, Constitutional amendments, and more.”

Words coming back to haunt them

Later in the DOJ filing, in a section meant to address the semantic games Democrats such as Nadler were playing with regard to “impeachment proceedings,” the DOJ lawyers more specifically quoted Pelosi to weaken those claims.

“Most prominently, the Speaker of the House has been emphatic that the investigation is not a true impeachment proceeding. On the same day the House adopted the resolution that the Committee claims authorized this suit, the Speaker told a reporter the House Democrat caucus was ‘not even close’ to an ‘impeachment inquiry,'” the DOJ noted.

“More recently, she has said, ‘I do know that we’ve been on a path of investigation and that includes the possibility of legislation or impeachment,'” the attorneys added, and threw in a quote from House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer for good measure. “And the House Majority Leader had even explained that branding the Committee’s proceeding as ‘impeachment’ is a simply a device to enhance the Committee’s legal arguments in this and other courts.”

In other words, despite Nadler’s assertions to the contrary, House Democrats aren’t officially impeaching President Trump yet, and even if they were, they still wouldn’t qualify for an exemption to the rules governing the secrecy of grand jury materials. The fact that the DOJ attorneys utilized quotes from Nadler’s superiors in the House to help make that case only served as hilariously ironic icing on this particular cake.

879 Responses

  1. Hello! I could have sworn I’ve been to this web site before but after going through a few of the posts I realized it’s new to me. Anyhow, I’m definitely delighted I found it and I’ll be book-marking it and checking back regularly!

  2. I’d like to thank you for the efforts you have put in writing this site. I am hoping to see the same high-grade blog posts by you later on as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has encouraged me to get my very own site now 😉

  3. Oh my goodness! Awesome article dude! Thank you so much, However I am going through difficulties with your RSS. I don’t understand the reason why I cannot join it. Is there anybody getting the same RSS problems? Anyone that knows the answer can you kindly respond? Thanx!!

  4. Aw, this was an extremely good post. Finding the time and actual effort to generate a really good article… but what can I say… I put things off a whole lot and never manage to get nearly anything done.

  5. Your style is really unique in comparison to other folks I’ve read stuff from. I appreciate you for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I will just bookmark this page.

  6. I’m very pleased to find this site. I wanted to thank you for your time due to this fantastic read!! I definitely really liked every little bit of it and i also have you book-marked to check out new information in your site.

  7. I’d like to thank you for the efforts you’ve put in writing this website. I am hoping to check out the same high-grade content from you in the future as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has inspired me to get my own, personal site now 😉

  8. Next time I read a blog, Hopefully it does not disappoint me as much as this particular one. After all, Yes, it was my choice to read, nonetheless I really thought you’d have something helpful to talk about. All I hear is a bunch of crying about something that you could fix if you weren’t too busy searching for attention.

  9. A fascinating discussion is worth comment. I do think that you should write more about this subject, it may not be a taboo subject but typically people do not speak about such subjects. To the next! All the best!!

  10. A fascinating discussion is worth comment. I believe that you should publish more on this topic, it might not be a taboo subject but usually people do not speak about these issues. To the next! Best wishes!!

  11. Oh my goodness! Amazing article dude! Thank you so much, However I am having problems with your RSS. I don’t understand the reason why I cannot join it. Is there anybody having identical RSS problems? Anyone that knows the answer will you kindly respond? Thanks!!

  12. Oh my goodness! Awesome article dude! Many thanks, However I am having troubles with your RSS. I don’t understand why I am unable to join it. Is there anyone else having identical RSS issues? Anyone who knows the solution will you kindly respond? Thanks!!

  13. I would like to thank you for the efforts you have put in penning this site. I really hope to see the same high-grade content from you in the future as well. In truth, your creative writing abilities has inspired me to get my own, personal blog now 😉

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Popular