California judge blocks attempt to force release of Trump’s tax returns

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

Democrats have been obsessed with getting their hands on President Donald Trump’s tax returns since before he even moved into the White House — but it doesn’t look like they’ll be succeeding in that effort any time soon.

California recently passed a law that would have required Trump to release his tax returns in order to appear on the state’s primary ballot in 2020, but a federal judge just issued an injunction to block that law from taking effect.

Judge issues temporary injunction

Fox News reported that U.S. District Judge Morrison England, Jr., an appointee of President George W. Bush, issued the injunction in order to prevent “irreparable harm without temporary relief” that could be inflicted on any candidate — not just Trump — if the law were to be enforced.

The judge noted that he would issue a final ruling on the merits of the case by the end of the month. But it is almost certain that the injunction and final ruling will be appealed.

At issue is a bill known as SB 27, which was signed into law by California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in July. The measure would require any candidate running for governor or president to submit to the state the previous five years of their tax returns in order to be eligible to appear on the 2020 primary ballot.

Supporters of the law claimed it was merely intended to increase transparency among candidates, but critics argued that it was aimed specifically at President Trump, would serve to depress turnout among Republican voters in primary elections, and would set a dangerous precedent going forward — on top of being blatantly unconstitutional.

Targeting Trump’s tax returns

“We are encouraged that the federal court has tentatively concluded that a preliminary injunction should be granted. We look forward to the court’s written order,” Trump attorney Jay Sekulow said of the ruling in a statement, according to The Hill.

He went on: “It remains our position that the law is unconstitutional because states are not permitted to add additional requirements for candidates for president, and that the law violated citizens’ First Amendment right of association.”

Fox reported that the court hearing on Thursday was actually a consolidation of five separate lawsuits filed against the state law, with Trump’s suit being the most high-profile of the bunch.

“The elephant in the room is President Trump’s tax returns — that’s what this is about,” Judge England said at one point in the hearing. “But it does have implications that are far-reaching.”

Setting a dangerous precedent

Those far-reaching implications include the fact that, if the demand for tax returns to be handed over was allowed to stand, it would set a precedent that could lead to states demanding other information as prerequisites for appearing on a ballot, such as medical records or college transcripts or other generally confidential and private information.

While this attempt by Democrats to garner Trump’s tax returns may have been blocked for now, the fight continues on as a prosecutor in New York has subpoenaed Trump’s returns from an accounting firm used by the Trump Organization. Meanwhile, Democrats in Washington aren’t giving up, either.

24 Responses

  1. I simply want to say I am new to blogging and seriously enjoyed your web site. More than likely I’m want to bookmark your blog . You absolutely come with excellent posts. Appreciate it for sharing your website page.

  2. I simply want to mention I am new to weblog and really loved this web site. More than likely I’m going to bookmark your website . You absolutely come with beneficial posts. Bless you for sharing with us your blog.

  3. I just couldn’t go away your web site prior to suggesting that I extremely enjoyed the standard info an individual supply in your visitors? Is going to be back regularly in order to check out new posts|

  4. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You clearly know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your weblog when you could be giving us something enlightening to read?

  5. Thank you for another informative blog. Where else could I get that kind of information written in such an ideal way? I’ve a project that I’m just now working on, and I have been on the look out for such information.

  6. Hello There. I found your weblog the usage of msn. This is a really smartly written article. I will make sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful info. Thank you for the post. I’ll definitely return.

  7. I’m really impressed along with your writing talents and also with the layout for your blog. Is that this a paid theme or did you customize it your self? Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it’s rare to look a great blog like this one these days..

  8. Thanks a bunch for sharing this with all folks you really recognize what you’re speaking approximately! Bookmarked. Please additionally talk over with my website =). We could have a link trade agreement between us!

  9. My partner and I absolutely love your blog and find a lot of your post’s to be just what I’m looking for. Would you offer guest writers to write content for you personally? I wouldn’t mind writing a post or elaborating on many of the subjects you write related to here. Again, awesome weblog!

  10. you are in point of fact a just right webmaster. The site loading velocity is amazing. It sort of feels that you are doing any distinctive trick. In addition, The contents are masterpiece. you have performed a great job on this topic!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Popular