President Trump announced that the US would halt funding to the World Health Organization while US officials conduct a review of the WHO’s action or inaction as the Covid-19 virus spread through populations, becoming an epidemic and then a pandemic.
The president explained that the US needs to understand the role of the organization in mismanaging and covering up the spread of the coronavirus before anymore US taxpayer dollars can be spent.
The US spends $400-800 million a year on the WHO. The president thinks that the WHO did not do its duty to warn the world of the seriousness of the coronavirus, but instead covered up for China, the source of the virus.
China, the second-largest economy in the world, spends a mere $40-90 million a year funding the WHO, a tenth of what the US spends. The president pointed out that it is not worth it for the US to continue to fund an organization so beholden to the country responsible for spreading the coronavirus around the world while the WHO covered for them.
As the world became more aware of what was happening in China, the president halted travel to and from China, but the WHO opposed travel restrictions along with the mainstream media and Democrats. Now, it is obvious that President Trump was right to stop flights first to and from China, then Italy and Europe, and then the UK. He was right, they were wrong.
The president did not hesitate to place blame for thousands of deaths on the WHO for the delays caused by covering for China. The other regions that followed the WHO’s advice, like Italy and Spain, have lost many thousands to the coronavirus.
WHO failed to fulfill its mission
The president also gave a brief history of the WHO along with its mission or reason to exist. Organized in 1948, the mission of the was the protection of international public health. The WHO exists to prevent global health crises.
They should have investigated the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan. But, President Trump pointed out, the WHO chose political correctness above lifesaving procedures.
That choice has also deprived the scientific community of lifesaving data that would aid them in the fight against the Covid-19 pandemic, and accurate truthful data is the only way scientists can arrive at a solution for COVID-19.
In fact, if the WHO had taken the right steps early on, the virus may have been contained in China.
Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC) supported the president, saying that it is in America’s best interest to halt funding:
Until WHO changes its behavior and leadership, I think it’s in America’s best interest to withhold funding. They’ve been deceptive, they’ve been slow, they’ve been Chinese apologists — and they’ve failed miserably when it comes to #COVID19. pic.twitter.com/8Ifb6ohOVF
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) April 15, 2020
WHO Director-General a shill for China
The WHO Director-General (DG) Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus praised China for its actions regarding their response to the coronavirus outbreak, even provoking a Council on Foreign Relations Asia Unbound writer to criticize him.
In contrast to his effusive praise for China, Tedros has been quick to criticize other countries for their responses to the outbreak. He called upon nations not to limit travel with China and warned against the “recrimination or politicization” of the outbreak. Domestic Chinese news coverage prominently features Tedros’ praise of Xi Jinping and criticism of foreign governments.
Michael Collins went on to reveal the extent of Tedros’ obligation to China, writing that Tedros was supported by China in his bid to become Director-General of the WHO. After he won the election, Tedros went on to assure China publicly that he supported “one China,” a euphemism for subjugation of Taiwan. It is China’s goal to bring Taiwan under its rule. Taiwan is currently excluded from the World Health Organization, not being recognized as a sovereign nation.
It is not surprising that Tedros scolded the United States for its actions regarding the coronavirus, because inherent in those actions is the spoken and unspoken truth that China is to blame for the Covid-19 pandemic.
Watch President Trump announce the defunding of the WHO:
2,326 Responses
Major thanks for the blog article. Cool.
Qué maravilla de artículo.
I know this web site offers quality dependent content and extra information, is there any other web page which gives such stuff in quality?|
Qué maravilla de artículo.
Thanks so much for the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.
Lo voy a mandar a compañeros.
Hey there! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and say I truly enjoy reading through your posts. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that go over the same topics? Appreciate it!|
I think this is a real great blog post.Really looking forward to read more.
I used to be able to find good advice from your blog posts.
This web site really has all of the information and facts I wanted concerning this subject and didn’t know who to ask.
Lo voy a mandar a compañeros.
Can you tell us more about this? I’d care to find out more details.|
Qué maravilla de artículo.
Lo voy a mandar a compañeros.
Qué maravilla de artículo.
Appreciate you sharing, great blog post. Great.
PULL MARKETING Le « pull » marketing, au contraire, consiste à « tirer » le client vers le produit. L’entreprise, via un contenu informatif, créé un besoin ou un souhait chez le consommateur et suscite son intérêt afin qu’il vienne de son plein gré. Avantages du pull : investissement durable (référencement naturel) audience qualifiée : meilleur taux de conversion et ROI plus élevé création d’une vraie interaction (marketing de contenu) et d’une relation de confiance avec ses clients très efficace sur le long terme (importante fidélisation) Inconvénients du pull : met du temps à se mettre en place cible trop large et taux de prospect très faible coûts élevés (campagne publicitaire, salons, échantillons…) effet d’accoutumance du consommateur aux publicités menant à une perte considérable voire totale d’efficacité
What’s up, its pleasant article on the topic of media print, we all know media is a wonderful source of information.|
Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You definitely know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could be giving us something informative to read?|
This is the perfect webpage for anyone who would like to find out about this topic. You realize so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I personally will need to…HaHa). You definitely put a brand new spin on a subject that has been written about for many years. Excellent stuff, just excellent!
Lo mejor que leí hoy.
Lo mejor que leí hoy.
This site was… how do I say it? Relevant!! Finally I have found something which helped me. Thanks!
Asking questions are genuinely pleasant thing if you are not understanding something completely, except this paragraph gives fastidious understanding yet.|
I was recommended this website by way of my cousin. I’m now not sure whether this put up is written via him as no one else recognize such unique about my difficulty. You are amazing! Thanks!
Do you have a spam issue on this site; I also am a blogger, and I was wanting to know your situation; many of us have created some nice practices and we are looking to trade methods with other folks, why not shoot me an e-mail if interested.|
I’ve learn several just right stuff here. Certainly price bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how a lot effort you put to make the sort of wonderful informative website.|
This is one awesome article.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.
L’occurrence du mot-clé : un rôle primordial sur le positionnement d’une page ? L’occurrence du mot-clé était auparavant une composante essentielle pour le référencement naturel et il correspond au nombre de fois où un mot-clé est présent et donc répété sur une page.?Dans son principe de base, le mot-clé est intégré de manière naturelle dans au contenu et celui-ci doit être placé dans les zones prises en compte par le robot de Google.??Aujourd’hui, il ne joue plus un rôle primordial dans le SEO. Cependant, cela ne veut pas dire qu’il faut négliger cette approche et quelques rappels sont nécessaires. Le mot-clé principal doit être intégré dans les balises principales et le texte
wow, awesome blog article.Thanks Again.
Keep on writing, great job!|
That is a great tip particularly to those new to the blogosphere. Short but very precise info… Many thanks for sharing this one. A must read post!
Fantastic blog post.Really looking forward to read more.
That is a great tip especially to those fresh to the blogosphere. Short but very precise info… Thanks for sharing this one. A must read post!
Valuable info. Lucky me I found your website by chance, and I’m shocked why this accident did not came about earlier! I bookmarked it.
Wonderful blog! I found it while surfing around on Yahoo News. Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Many thanks|