NYT-Mueller insider confirms Buzzfeed’s bombshell Michael Cohen report was false

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

Buzzfeed — the same outlet that first published the largely debunked and discredited Christopher Steele dossier in 2016 — released yet another anti-Trump “bombshell” story on Thursday that was revealed to be a complete dud less than 24 hours later. That story alleged that Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation had evidence that President Donald Trump had instructed former attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress.

Much of the media ran wild with the story for the day, speculating broadly about the impeachment or resignation that could result from the story “if true” (no other media outlet could confirm Buzzfeed’s “scoop”) — that is, until a spokesman for Mueller released a surprising statement totally debunking the Buzzfeed allegation, and insiders like a New York Times source close to the Mueller probe confirmed that Buzzfeed’s story was wrong.

The Times contradicts Buzzfeed report

The New York Times — who somewhat surprisingly refrained from jumping on the “we’ve got him now!” bandwagon with the Buzzfeed story — released a story of their own Friday night that cited an anonymous insider “familiar with” Cohen’s testimony to the special counsel, who suggested that Cohen had never said that Trump had instructed him to lie to Congress.

The New York Times has not independently confirmed the BuzzFeed report,” the article from The Times noted. “One person familiar with Mr. Cohen’s testimony to the special counsel’s prosecutors said that Mr. Cohen did not state that the president had pressured him to lie to Congress.”

The Times also shared the official statement released by a spokesman for Mueller’s investigation, Peter Carr, who said:

BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the special counsel’s office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s congressional testimony are not accurate.

The Times further noted: “The statement by Mr. Carr, the special counsel’s spokesman, was unusual because it appeared to be the first time he had publicly challenged the facts of a news media account that had generated significant attention for its revelations about the president.”

A significant rebuttal

There was indeed “significant attention” given to the Buzzfeed story — and not just by the typical Trump-hating media outlets and personalities.

A number of elected Democrat officials, many of whom seemed to almost salivate at the mere thought that the president had finally been caught committing an impeachable offense — in this case, actual obstruction of justice by virtue of suborned perjury — also made note of the story in TV appearances and on social media.

But just as “significant” as the attention paid to the Buzzfeed story was the rebuttal it received from the Mueller probe, which — as duly noted by the Times — hasn’t exactly been outspoken in the past about knocking down the many “fake news” bombshells that have proven to be duds over the past year or so.

Rare skepticism from the NYT

Perhaps as surprising as the Mueller probe statement was the restraint shown by the Times in choosing not to run with the Buzzfeed story, which was noted by National Review‘s Kyle Smith before the Times ran their report undercutting Buzzfeed’s article.

After first laying out how these big bombshell stories usually are treated by the rest of the media — they first “pickup” the initial report while quietly attempting to “match” it with their own reports — Smith noted that “the New York Times’ response has been not what I would have expected. So far, on its site, the only indication I can find that the Times even acknowledges that the BuzzFeed story exists is this Associated Press story, which doesn’t even pop up on the main page or the politics page.”

Smith further noted that The Washington Post had several stories based on the Buzzfeed bombshell on their main page, and revealed that he knew reporters for the Times were working to “match” the original story. “But in the meantime,” he wrote, “you would expect them to at least run a big story on the homepage saying, ‘Report claims Trump directed Cohen to lie to Congress.’ They haven’t done that. To me that says the New York Times is skeptical about either this story in particular, or BuzzFeed in general, or both.”

[show_poll poll_id=1283]

Skepticism is a good way to treat most of the “bombshell” anti-Trump stories that come out every week or so, as the overwhelming majority of them quickly prove to be non-explosive duds, or worse: manufactured “fake news.”

Skepticism toward Buzzfeed is especially good, as well, given their prior track record of publishing unverified and uncorroborated “fake news” about the president — something the Times seemed to get this time, while the rest of the media eagerly took the bait and ran with it.

384 Responses

  1. Howdy! Someone in my Facebook group shared this website with us so I came to take a look. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Great blog and amazing design.

  2. Generally I do not read article on blogs, but I wish to say that this write-up very pressured me to take a look at and do it! Your writing taste has been surprised me. Thanks, very nice article.

  3. This design is wicked! You certainly know how to keep a reader amused. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Great job. I really enjoyed what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it. Too cool!

  4. I do not even understand how I ended up here, but I thought this submit was great. I don’t recognize who you are however certainly you are going to a well-known blogger if you happen to are not already 😉 Cheers!

  5. Does your website have a contact page? I’m having problems locating it but, I’d like to send you an email. I’ve got some ideas for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great website and I look forward to seeing it improve over time.

  6. Wonderful work! This is the type of info that should be shared around the web. Shame on the search engines for not positioning this post higher! Come on over and visit my web site . Thanks =)

  7. Its like you read my mind! You appear to know a lot about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you can do with a few pics to drive the message home a little bit, but instead of that, this is fantastic blog. A fantastic read. I’ll definitely be back.

  8. Hi, I do think this is a great site. I stumbledupon it 😉 I may come back once again since i have book marked it. Money and freedom is the best way to change, may you be rich and continue to guide others.

  9. certainly like your web-site however you have to take a look at the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling problems and I find it very bothersome to tell the reality however Ill surely come again again.

  10. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You clearly know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your weblog when you could be giving us something informative to read?

  11. I blog often and I seriously thank you for your content. This article has truly peaked my interest. I’m going to bookmark your site and keep checking for new information about once per week. I opted in for your RSS feed as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Popular