Critics of acting AG Whitaker allege violations of the Hatch Act

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

When President Donald Trump accepted the resignation of Attorney General Jeff Sessions the day after the midterm elections and promptly named Sessions’ Chief of Staff Matt Whitaker to serve temporarily as an unconfirmed acting attorney general, Democrats wasted no time in launching a full-on assault against the new pick.

Some have suggested that Whitaker is too partisan to head the Department of Justice. Other Democrat activists have also dug up “evidence” to prompt a federal inquiry into possible Hatch Act violations by Whitaker.

The federal Office of Special Counsel — a completely separate entity than the Robert Mueller special counsel probe investigating alleged Russian election interference — is looking into whether fairly recent contributions into an old campaign fund for Whitaker violated the Hatch Act, which restricts certain political activities for federal employees.

Hatch Act violations?

Primarily at issue for the Office of Special Counsel investigation are four donations totaling about $8,800, made in early 2018 to the old 2014 campaign fund that still remained following Whitaker’s unsuccessful bid for a Senate seat from Iowa.

Liberal-leaning watchdog group American Oversight filed a complaint with the Office of Special Counsel alleging Hatch Act violations in relation to those recent donations. Though the office has confirmed that it will look into the matter, it is noteworthy that the office can only recommend disciplinary action to the Department of Justice — now headed by Whitaker himself — and not take any such actions on its own.

Austin Evers, executive director of American Oversight, told CNN, “After years of being completely dormant and only after he joined Jeff Sessions’ office as chief of staff, Whitaker’s campaign started receiving a cluster of contributions. It appears to violate the black-letter law of the Hatch Act.”

CNN tracked down the former treasurer of Whitaker’s failed Senate campaign, former Whitaker law partner William Gustoff, who said the recent donations had not been solicited by him or Whitaker, explained that the 2014 campaign fund had remained active in order to pay back Whitaker for funds he loaned his own campaign, and noted that he’d had no contact with any of the donors.

Partisan political activities

Other separate issues that Whitaker’s opponents hope to use against him include the $900,000 in compensation he received in 2016-2017 from a non-profit group known as The Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust.

Another issue is Whitaker’s prior political activities — as far back as 2008, when he was a U.S. Attorney in Iowa — such as registering, but not using, political website domain names, which could call into question his impartiality and level of partisanship.

Along those lines, Whitaker has also faced withering criticism from Democrats for opinionated commentary he delivered as a civilian in recent years with regard to the alleged crimes of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the need to limit the scope of the Mueller investigation.

[show_poll poll_id=1071]

Those last two reasons — a stated desire to see Clinton prosecuted and Mueller reined in — are what is really at issue here with Whitaker’s critics, as they fear he will proceed with prosecution against Clinton — as well as others in her orbit — and either undermine or completely end the Mueller probe.

The allegations of Hatch Act violations and prior partisan activity are merely a smokescreen and an attempt to discredit Whitaker in a nakedly partisan bid to protect Clinton and Mueller, as if past attorney generals weren’t totally partisan themselves, such as Eric Holder or Loretta Lynch.

Whether that effort succeeds at knocking Whitaker out of DOJ action remains to be seen.

537 Responses

  1. Oh my goodness! Impressive article dude! Many thanks, However I am going through difficulties with your RSS. I don’t understand why I can’t join it. Is there anybody else getting identical RSS problems? Anybody who knows the solution can you kindly respond? Thanks!!

  2. Pretty element of content. I simply stumbled upon your blog and in accession capital to claim that I acquire in fact enjoyed account your weblog posts. Any way I will be subscribing for your feeds or even I achievement you get admission to persistently fast.

  3. This web page can be a stroll-through for all the data you wanted about this and didnt know who to ask. Glimpse here, and youll undoubtedly discover it.

  4. I just could not depart your website prior to suggesting that I really enjoyed the standard information a person provide for your visitors? Is going to be back often to check up on new posts

  5. Howdy just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your article seem to be running off the screen in Chrome. I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with web browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know. The style and design look great though! Hope you get the problem resolved soon. Cheers

  6. Having read this I thought it was really informative. I appreciate you finding the time and energy to put this content together. I once again find myself personally spending a significant amount of time both reading and commenting. But so what, it was still worthwhile!

  7. I would like to thank you for the efforts you have put in penning this site. I am hoping to see the same high-grade blog posts from you in the future as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has encouraged me to get my own website now 😉

  8. Next time I read a blog, Hopefully it does not fail me just as much as this particular one. After all, I know it was my choice to read, but I genuinely believed you would probably have something interesting to talk about. All I hear is a bunch of complaining about something you could fix if you weren’t too busy seeking attention.

  9. Thanks for the sensible critique. Me & my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this. We got a grab a book from our area library but I think I learned more from this post. I am very glad to see such excellent information being shared freely out there.

  10. I have not checked in here for some time as I thought it was getting boring, but the last several posts are great quality so I guess Ill add you back to my everyday bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

  11. I’m pretty pleased to discover this website. I need to to thank you for ones time just for this fantastic read!! I definitely appreciated every part of it and I have you saved as a favorite to check out new stuff in your website.

  12. After looking into a number of the blog posts on your website, I really like your way of writing a blog. I added it to my bookmark site list and will be checking back soon. Please visit my website as well and tell me what you think.

  13. I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here. The sketch is tasteful, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an edginess over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again as exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this increase.

  14. It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d definitely donate to this outstanding blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to fresh updates and will talk about this website with my Facebook group. Chat soon!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Popular